Meta is set to introduce its OpenClaw competitor, Hatch, in the coming weeks.

      Meta aims to introduce a consumer AI agent in a matter of weeks, potentially pricing it at up to $199.99 per month. Three months ago, the company began offering access to its AI chatbot for $7.99 monthly, meaning the new product could be priced 25 times higher.

      According to internal documents reviewed by Jyoti Mann for The Information, Meta is set to launch the consumer version of the OpenClaw AI agent "in the next several weeks," with October being the target for a new model named Watermelon. Internally, the agent is referred to as Hatch.

      The purpose of Hatch is to facilitate access to services users are already utilizing, such as DoorDash, Etsy, Reddit, Yelp, and Microsoft Outlook, allowing them to perform tasks without leaving the app—ordering food, making purchases, checking reviews, managing their inbox, and more.

      Early prototypes feature a dashboard highlighting tools created for the user, such as a fitness tracker or travel itinerary, as reported by Ryan Merket on RuntimeWire, citing the same documents.

      Hatch represents Meta's response to OpenClaw, the open-source personal agent that operates on a user's personal machine and manages emails, calendars, and other services through messaging apps. Unlike OpenClaw, which is free but complex to set up, requiring command-line skills and decisions regarding models, credentials, and permissions, Meta provides a packaged solution that includes its infrastructure. This is central to its proposition, explaining the higher price point.

      Peter Steinberger, the creator of OpenClaw, incurred a monthly bill of $1.3 million in tokens while running agents at scale, indicating that someone needs to cover the computational costs—Meta appears to be passing this expense onto users.

      While final pricing remains undetermined, Meta is considering a tiered model, as reported by The Information in June, which could include a premium monthly subscription at $199.99 granting higher usage limits. Hatch Plus is described internally as a tier with five to ten times the daily capacity of the free product, with allowances resetting at each billing cycle, according to RuntimeWire.

      This insight suggests that the $199.99 isn’t just a price for an assistant but rather a monthly fee related to computational costs.

      However, not everyone believes this price point is viable. Jeremiah Dillon succinctly expressed skepticism on X, stating the market for a consumer version of OpenClaw at $199.99 is effectively zero. Dillon, who has experience in product marketing at companies like Confluent, Stripe, Google, and others, acknowledged that while The Information's accuracy is generally reliable, there could be an unseen aspect.

      In a subsequent post, he proposed a possibility: if the cost for Meta to operate a consumer version of OpenClaw averages $199.99 per user monthly in Opus API charges, he could accept that.

      This perspective reinterprets the number as not simply a price tag but rather an estimate of operational costs.

      Additionally, Meta is developing a WhatsApp feature that enables users to interact with AI agents from other companies, with a limited rollout expected soon, according to RuntimeWire reporting on The Information.

      This dual strategy allows Meta to market its own agent while making WhatsApp a platform for other agents to reach consumers, a more valuable position as distribution holds greater longevity than any single product.

      Hatch is based on Anthropic’s models, as first reported by The Information in May, initially operating on Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 during its development. Meta intends to transition it to its own Muse Spark models prior to launch.

      The next model, Watermelon, aims for an October release, but it remains unclear if it will be integrated within the Muse family or branded differently, as reported by The Information.

      Meta has been rapidly deploying updates, with Muse Spark 1.2 and the Muse Code terminal agent introduced on August 5, followed by Muse Glimmer, a 30-billion-parameter open-weight model, released five days later.

      Meta's financial context is significant; it reported $60.8 billion in revenue for the second quarter, with advertising accounting for $59.36 billion, which is about 98% of total revenue. The company expects capital expenditures to range from $130 billion to $145 billion this year, nearly double last year at the midpoint.

      An analysis of those results suggested that while Microsoft’s investments in AI converted into cloud revenue, Meta’s efforts resulted in a cash-flow deficit. Thus, a paid agent doesn’t need to entirely replace advertising; it must generate revenue proportional to the computational resources users consume, which advertising currently fails to achieve.

      Zuckerberg articulated a vision three weeks ago, stating in an essay on August 10 that Meta would create personal agents for billions of individuals, offering free versions while charging for enhanced computing capabilities. At the time, we interpreted this essay as both a mission statement and a pricing guideline. The Hatch Plus tier aligns with the latter.

      In Europe