Razr Fold versus Galaxy Z Fold 7: I’m tentatively impressed by what Motorola’s first foldable device brings to the table, all while saving $300.
You've decided to invest a considerable amount in a book-style foldable that delivers a large-screen experience while being portable enough to fold in half. Sounds great, right? However, here's something to consider: the Galaxy Z Fold 7 (256GB), launched in July 2025, still sells for $1,999, whereas the newly announced Moto Razr Fold (512GB) is priced at $1,899.
How did Motorola manage that? Did it make sacrifices while undercutting the Fold 7 by $100 while providing double the storage? There are a few drawbacks that might not sit well with you, especially if your purchasing choice hinges on the specifications. A more beneficial approach, in my view, is to look beyond the numbers and think about how you intend to use the device.
I'm not presenting this comparison to declare a victor based on specs; instead, the goal is to help you determine if Motorola's first attempt at the book-fold format is worth your investment or if the Galaxy Z Fold 7, despite being older, still proves itself in 2026 as a better fit for your needs.
**Razr Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7: Quick Specifications Overview**
| Feature | Razr Fold 2026 (16GB/512GB) | Galaxy Z Fold 7 (12GB/256GB) | Difference |
|---------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| **Price** | $1,899 | $1,999 | $100 cheaper at base, $300 cheaper for equivalent storage variant |
| **Dimensions** | Unfolded: 144.47 × 160.05 × 4.7mm Folded: 160.05 × 73.6 × 10.04mm 243g | Unfolded: 158.2 × 143 × 4.2mm Folded: 168.4 × 72.6 × 8.9mm 215g | Z Fold 7 is 28g lighter and 1.14mm thinner when folded |
| **Inner Display** | 8.1″ LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 6,200 nits, HDR10+ | 8.0″ Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, 2,600 nits, 368ppi | +3,600 nits peak brightness |
| **Cover Display** | 6.6″ LTPO pOLED, 165Hz, 6,000 nits | 6.2″ Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, 21:9 ratio | Brighter and faster refresh |
| **Processor** | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (3nm) | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (3nm) | Newer but slightly slower chip |
| **RAM / Storage** | 16GB / 512GB — all variants | 12GB / 256GB and 512GB; 16GB on 1TB only | More RAM at the equivalent storage variant |
| **Main Camera** | 50MP (f/1.6), Sony LYTIA 828, OIS | 200MP (f/1.7), ISOCELL HP2, OIS | Lower resolution sensor |
| **Ultrawide** | 50MP (f/2.0), 122°, Macro Vision, Sony LYTIA | 12MP (f/2.2), 120°, autofocus | Fold: higher resolution; Z Fold 7: autofocus |
| **Telephoto** | 50MP (f/2.4), 3x optical, Sony LYTIA | 10MP (f/2.4), 3x optical | Significantly higher resolution |
| **Cover Selfie** | 32MP (f/2.0), punch-hole | 10MP (f/2.2), punch-hole | Higher resolution, wider aperture |
| **Inner Selfie** | 20MP (f/2.0), punch-hole | 10MP (f/2.2), punch-hole | Higher resolution |
| **Battery** | 6,000mAh silicon-carbon | 4,400mAh Li-Polymer | Bigger battery |
| **Wired Charging** | 80W wired, 50W wireless, 5W reverse | 25W wired, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse | Faster wired and wireless charging |
| **Stylus** | Moto Pen Ultra ($99 extra) | No S Pen (dropped after Z Fold 5) | Stylus support available |
| **Cover Glass** | Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3 | Gorilla Glass
Other articles
Razr Fold versus Galaxy Z Fold 7: I’m tentatively impressed by what Motorola’s first foldable device brings to the table, all while saving $300.
Motorola focused its first release on creating the most robust hardware case possible. In contrast, Samsung dedicated seven generations to designing the most reliable daily-use case.
