Your upcoming visit to the cinema might be subject to a ban on Meta smart glasses.

      Ray-Ban

      Smart glasses aim to simplify the process of capturing moments without the need to use a phone. However, when those moments occur in a movie theater, the situation becomes more complex. Cinemas throughout the UK are contemplating restrictions on smart glasses equipped with cameras, including Meta’s Ray-Ban, due to fears that they could be used to secretly record and pirate films.

      The UK Cinema Association (UKCA), which represents cinema operators nationwide, indicates that some locations are considering policies to either limit or entirely ban camera-enabled glasses. While no widespread prohibitions are currently in place among its members, this could change as smart glasses gain popularity.

      Smart glasses present a new challenge for cinemas

      Piracy has long been a concern for theaters, but smart glasses complicate the issue. It is relatively easy to detect someone using a smartphone or camera during a screening, but a person wearing glasses is much harder to notice. Although Meta’s glasses include a privacy feature designed to make recording more apparent—a front LED light that flashes while the camera is active—concerns persist. Individuals have already reported being filmed without their awareness. Other venues in the UK, such as ATG Theatres, have resisted smart glasses by prohibiting filming during performances and reserving the right to ask patrons wearing such glasses to remove them. Wetherspoons has also criticized these camera-equipped glasses, with CEO Tim Martin claiming that people should not be able to record anyone without consent. For movie theaters, the potential for glasses to serve as hands-free camcorders aimed at the screen poses another reason for caution.

      However, banning them is not straightforward

      There’s another aspect to consider: smart glasses are not merely small cameras attached to someone's face. Meta contends that its glasses offer genuine utility, particularly for users who are blind or have low vision. Functions like live translation and hands-free assistance can enhance accessibility in scenarios where reaching for a phone is impractical. The UKCA recognizes this too. Smart glasses could benefit moviegoers with accessibility needs by providing personalized subtitles. Consequently, an outright ban could eliminate a genuinely valuable tool while attempting to tackle the piracy issue.

      This situation leaves cinemas with a challenging balancing act. They must safeguard films and the privacy of theatergoers while not excluding those who rely on the technology. The UKCA notes that this issue is still unfolding, and policies will need to adapt proportionately as technology advances. However, as smart glasses grow increasingly capable, cinemas may soon need to determine whether to allow them in theaters during your next movie outing.

      Shimul is a contributor at Digital Trends, bringing over five years of experience in the tech sector.

      One-third of the web is showing signs of AI authorship, thanks to ChatGPT

      A study by the Pew Research Center reveals that around one-third of web pages published since the release of ChatGPT exhibit indications of AI authorship.

      The internet has been inundated with AI-generated content since the introduction of ChatGPT, and a new analysis from Pew Research Center illustrates just how extensive this phenomenon has become.

      Meta’s AI assistant finally arrives on Mac, but it has some catching up to do

      Meta has launched its Meta AI assistant for Mac users through a dedicated desktop app, providing another AI chatbot option alongside existing tabs. The app can analyze what’s displayed on the screen, respond to questions related to that content, generate material, and accept voice dictation throughout macOS.

      AI may be learning from billions of images without citing any of them

      Research from MIT has uncovered what they term “attribution decay” in large generative models.

      In the realm of generative AI, a pressing question arises: if an AI generates an image, can one pinpoint the specific images that inspired it? A recent study from MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory suggests that, for sufficiently large models, this may often be impossible. Researchers Dai and Gifford describe this phenomenon as “attribution decay” in their open-access paper, published today in Nature Communications. This concept refers to how the influence of any single piece of training data becomes harder to trace as the dataset expands.

      The larger the dataset, the more ambiguous the attribution becomes.