The minimalist phone is gradually evolving back into a smartphone.

      I appreciate minimalist phones theoretically more than I likely would in real life. I desire fewer triggers to look at a screen, yet I recognize that I'm accustomed to my phone performing everyday tasks swiftly and easily.

      This is why I'm intrigued by the Minimal Phone 2. It replaces the E-paper display of the original model with a smoother 90Hz AMOLED screen, along with upgraded hardware, 5G, and improved cameras. If I were to purchase one, I’d probably want most of those enhancements as well. However, when you combine all these features, the Minimal Phone starts to resemble the very smartphones it aimed to provide an alternative to.

      The Minimal Company

      The restrictions were part of the charm

      The first Minimal Phone succeeded in part due to its non-negotiable limitations. Minimal marketed the E-paper display as a means to minimize distractions while still allowing access to Android apps. You could still download YouTube or Instagram, but using either on E-paper wasn’t exactly enticing. Scrolling through content suddenly demanded some commitment.

      The Minimal Phone The Minimal Company

      I can see why a phone might occasionally make me think, “Actually, never mind,” when I reach for it out of boredom. Some users shared similar views, insisting that the E-paper experience was what distinguished the Minimal Phone from another Android device with a keyboard.

      The Phone 2 complicates that relationship. A quicker and smoother experience eliminates real frustrations, which is generally what I seek from a new phone. This improvement, however, also removes one of the original model’s most effective methods for encouraging me to put it down.

      The Minimal Company

      There are valid reasons for the change

      Minimal also had practical motives for moving away from E-paper. One of its developers mentioned that sourcing an appropriate panel in the right size and making a significant improvement over the first model would demand costly research and development.

      I can understand why some users would embrace the shift. While deliberate inconvenience might seem appealing, it can hinder you from completing essential tasks. Over time, a phone that is meant to promote healthier habits can become bothersome. However, some users perceive that frustration as part of what they paid for initially.

      The Minimal Company

      I find myself caught between those perspectives. I don’t want my phone beckoning me into hours of scrolling, but I also don’t want accessing a boarding pass to feel like a test of my character.

      Can software make up for an irritating screen?

      The Phone 2 now relies on software to handle much of what the E-paper display previously managed automatically. Minimal still wants the experience to feel more serene and intentional, with features like Focus Hours helping to shape phone usage, even as the underlying hardware becomes more user-friendly.

      The Minimal Company

      This is where I start to feel less convinced. An E-paper display doesn’t take my discipline into account that afternoon. If Instagram looks unpleasant on it, it looks unpleasant. Software-based restraint requires more self-discipline from me than a display that physically discourages distractions.

      Perhaps this is the dilemma. People still anticipate that a costly phone will respond promptly and manage essential tasks, and it's difficult to fault anyone for wanting that. But Minimal can continually enhance the Phone 2 until there’s hardly anything left in the hardware preventing me from treating it like any other smartphone.

      The Minimal Phone 2 might turn out to be the more practical product due to these modifications. However, at some point, one has to question whether “Minimal” accurately describes the phone, or if it merely reflects the narrative you tell yourself while toting yet another nearly-smartphone in disguise.