The TCL Note A1 Nxtpaper might lead you to reconsider the Kindle Scribe Colorsoft.

      The tablet is set to debut on Kickstarter shortly, with prices starting at $419.

      Just days after the release of Amazon’s new Kindle Scribe Colorsoft, a potential rival has been unveiled. TCL has introduced its upcoming Nxtpaper tablet, which competes with Amazon’s product by featuring an 11.5-inch paper-like display and stylus support.

      TCL's Note A1 Nxtpaper aims to provide a more visually comfortable option compared to tablets with glossy LCD screens, thanks to its Nxtpaper Pure display. Designed to replicate the appearance and texture of real paper, this display promises to reduce glare and offers a textured surface that enhances the writing experience.

      The tablet includes built-in stylus support, and TCL claims it delivers improved handwriting input with minimal ghosting. Additionally, it incorporates various AI-enabled tools aimed at enhancing the writing experience, such as handwriting beautification and AI-assisted one-stroke handwriting formation.

      According to TCL’s marketing materials, the Note A1 also comes with extra AI capabilities for note-taking, transcription of meetings, translation, summarization, and writing assistance. Furthermore, the tablet supports content casting, cross-device transfers, and cloud backups, facilitating easier content sharing and note synchronization across devices.

      Slim with extensive document support

      Measuring 260.1 x 196.6 x 5.5mm and weighing around 500g, the Note A1 Nxtpaper is designed with a slim profile. It supports a variety of document formats, including PDF, Word, PPT, PPTX, Excel, EPUB, TXT, MOBI, AZW3, CHM, HTML, FB2, RTF, CBZ, and CBE, giving it a significant advantage over the Kindle Scribe Colorsoft.

      Although TCL has not yet provided an exact launch date, the company has confirmed the tablet will be available soon at a starting price of $419 through Kickstarter.

      In contrast, the Kindle Scribe Colorsoft is notably pricier, starting at $629.99. While Amazon does offer a standard Kindle Scribe at a price comparable to the Note A1, it features a black-and-white display, which may not meet the needs of users looking for color capabilities and greater flexibility.

      Pranob is an experienced tech journalist with over eight years of expertise in consumer technology coverage. His work has been…

      Apple subtly reduces trade-in values, making your next upgrade more costly

      Apple has decreased the trade-in values for your old devices at a faster rate than depreciation. As reported by MacRumors, the updated trade-in values for iPhones, Macs, iPads, and Apple Watches show significant reductions, with some cuts reaching up to 25%. These adjustments come just before the holiday shopping season, effectively raising upgrade costs for those relying on trade-in credits. The iPhone 15 Pro Max now has a top trade-in value of $470, down from $630, marking about a 25% decline.

      I evaluated an AI-powered competitor to the Kindle Scribe, revealing how Amazon is lagging behind

      The Boox Note Air 5C offers a much wider range of features at a price significantly lower than Amazon's slate.

      The competition in the e-ink reader market has evolved considerably over the past few years. Amazon’s Kindle, previously the go-to choice, now faces an increasing number of better-equipped alternatives across a variety of formats. This year saw a major update to Amazon's Kindle lineup, with the company diversifying its Scribe model into three unique options at different price points. Users now receive a stylus, a colorful design, and the choice between color and black-and-white displays. The message is clear: Amazon aims to cater to a broad audience.

      Safari may not be the best browser for iPad, and I was surprised by the solution I discovered

      Here’s a hint: It’s not Chrome. This alternative surpasses Safari in practical browsing advantages.

      The browsing experience on the iPad has not progressed much over the years. Despite numerous aesthetic and functional updates in the “series 26” refresh across the software portfolio, the core experience remains largely unchanged. This stagnation primarily stems from Apple’s preference for browser developers to utilize the same WebKit rendering engine as Safari on the iPad.

      In summary, developers have minimal control over modifying the WebKit engine, which limits their ability to offer significant next-generation features or performance enhancements. It has been nearly 20 months since Apple permitted developers in the EU (and soon in Japan) to experiment with alternative engines.