Xbox Game Pass has just become more affordable, and I have no objections to the change that comes with it.
If there's one thing the gaming industry enjoys as much as hype cycles, it's a significant value shake-up. Currently, Xbox Game Pass is undergoing just that. Microsoft has officially reduced prices across its Game Pass tiers, making the service more affordable at a time when subscription fatigue is definitely prevalent. However, as is often the case, there's a twist—and it's a substantial one.
The price reduction accompanied by a twist
First, let's get to the figures, as they are quite striking. The cost of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate has decreased from $29.99 to $22.99 per month, while PC Game Pass is now priced at $13.99 instead of $16.49. This is not an insignificant amount. Over the course of a year, this represents a notable saving, particularly for players managing several subscriptions.
Game Pass Ultimate has become too costly for many players. Starting today, the monthly price is dropping from $29.99 to $22.99. Future Call of Duty titles will no longer be available on Game Pass Ultimate on their release day but will instead be added to this tier the following holiday after launch (approximately...— Asha (@asha_shar) April 21, 2026
However, here’s the catch. New Call of Duty titles will not be available on the service at launch anymore. Instead, they will appear much later—roughly a year post-release. It’s important to note that existing Call of Duty titles will still be accessible, so the back catalog remains unchanged. What’s missing is the immediate access to one of gaming’s most significant annual releases, which has long been a key selling point for Game Pass.
The community's reaction is… mixed
The response? As chaotic as was anticipated. There’s a considerable group of genuinely relieved players. Not everyone subscribes to Game Pass for Call of Duty, so for those users, this feels like gaining a discount without sacrificing anything essential. If COD wasn't part of their regular play, then the reduced price is genuinely beneficial.
On the flip side, many players feel that Game Pass built its reputation on the idea of “pay once, play everything on day one.” The loss of a flagship franchise from that promise feels like a significant setback. It isn’t solely about Call of Duty; it's about the implications for the future.
Microsoft has reduced Game Pass prices while quietly removing Call of Duty Day One releases. They’re charging less for a diminished product, claiming it's ‘a response to feedback’. Don’t be misled. This is a downgrade masquerading as marketing. pic.twitter.com/xn7dFQmcvw— Yorch Torch Games (@YorchTorchGames) April 21, 2026
Then comes the third wave of opinions, arguably the most intriguing. Some fans are now questioning whether Microsoft should go further and begin eliminating other bundled benefits like EA Play or Fortnite Crew to achieve even lower prices.
The reasoning is straightforward. If removing one costly element reduces the price, why not tailor the entire service?
Reasons behind Microsoft's decision
This is where the discussion turns from emotional to practical. Call of Duty is not just another title in the lineup; it’s an annual blockbuster with a vast, loyal player base that often purchases the game regardless of subscriptions. This creates a peculiar value discrepancy. Players either would have bought it anyway, or they didn’t care about it.
Xbox forfeited over $300 million in Call of Duty sales on consoles and PCs last year – Bloomberg
From Microsoft’s standpoint, this makes it an extremely expensive inclusion with limited benefits. Worse, it probably detracts from direct sales, transforming what should be a revenue boost into a cost liability. While some fans advocate for further reductions, like the removal of EA Play, the situation is not so straightforward. Game Pass thrives as an all-in-one platform. Begin to unbundle excessively, and it risks turning into a fragmented, a la carte service that loses its identity.
As Microsoft even explores incorporating services like Netflix into Game Pass, removing more perks could undermine its “all-in-one” appeal. At that point, it’s no longer a powerhouse package; it’s merely a menu with missing items.
Is this the end of “too good to be true”?
For years, Xbox Game Pass felt like a cheat code—offering day-one AAA games, a vast library, and a price that seemed almost unreal. However, eventually, reality caught up. Keeping a high-profile title like Call of Duty available from day one was always going to be costly—and, more importantly, unsustainable.
Microsoft
In all honesty, this change feels like Microsoft is finally acknowledging that reality. Instead of raising prices further, they have reduced one of the most expensive perks and made the service more accessible again. It’s not ideal, and undoubtedly some fans will miss the past, but this appears less like a downgrade and more like a smart recalibration. Less flashy, but designed for longevity.
Other articles
Xbox Game Pass has just become more affordable, and I have no objections to the change that comes with it.
Xbox Game Pass lowers its price but loses day-one access to Call of Duty. Is this a strategic reset or a decline in value? Here’s what’s different, the significance of these changes, and how gamers are responding.
